l be Voter I.D. for the Midterm Elections," US president Donald Trump declared in a February 13 Truth Social rant, "whether approved by Congress or not!"
While I oppose government ID mandates for any purpose -- as did "conservatives," at least as late as the 1990s, when it came to national requirements of the sort -- I don't consider voting a special case for which my objections need be stronger or weaker.
Voting in America is a ritual through which we flatter ourselves that we're engaging in "democracy," even "self-government," when 99% of participants periodically choose between two convergent (and nearly identical) wings of the single state-approved political party.
As for the other 1%, which includes me (I'm a partisan Libertarian), we enjoy the freedom to cough during communion, to whisper "I rather prefer freedom" as the crowd yells "Hail Caesar," but it's not like our votes are going to bring down the Church of American Government.
It makes about as much difference to how we're governed from DC as the selection of local Communist Party delegates in Norilsk made to how the Soviet Union was governed from Moscow.
Since voting is purely ceremonial affirmation of our masters' authority over us, I don't see that adding a card-flashing element to the liturgy makes much difference.
I am, however, glad to see Trump once again reaffirming Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought's 2022 observation that "we are in a post constitutional moment in our country."
Vought says that like it's a bad thing, calling on his audience to become "radical constitutionalists."
His version of "radical constitutionalism," though, can't be found anywhere in the actual Constitution. Instead of the mere functionary described in the Constitution, whose job is to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed," Vought's envisions the president as Kim Jong Un on the Potomac.
Which brings me back to voter ID.
According to Article I of the Constitution, "The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators."
And the Constitution leaves the selection of presidential electors to the states.
Here's the constitutional role of the president in American elections:
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
So, constitutionally, Trump is not acting -- and cannot be acting -- as president when he bellows "whether approved by Congress or not!"
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).




