On Monday I interviewed a member of the Executive Committee of AIPAC. I asked him how he could defend and promote apartheid and genocide. He was not a legal witness; I could not order him not to change the subject. Still, he provided pretty clear (if very weak) excuses for genocide, which I think can be broken up into five types.
- Others have done it.
The U.S. killed Native Americans, he pointed out. The U.S. starved Germans and Japanese. Israel labels half the people it kills as Hamas, and a ratio of 1 proper person killed to 1 improper person killed is well within the norms of recent wars and massacres.
Of course, horrific outrages committed by the U.S. government or anyone else do not justify or legalize them from Israel. Murdering tens of thousands of people "accidentally" but in proper proportion to murdering tends of thousands of other people "intentionally" isn't legal or moral. Neither half of that sick calculation is legal or moral.
- Israel isn't doing it.
Hamas is causing Israel's actions, over which Israel has no power or responsibility, and any non-Hamas people could survive just fine by living underground.
Others will claim that Israel causes Hamas's actions, but in fact everyone causes their own actions. Israel's atrocities in the West Bank where there is no Hamas are no more or less Israel's responsibility than Israel's genocide in Gaza. Blaming a population for not living underground while you bomb their homes flat won't convince people who haven't been paid to be convinced.
- Those aren't people.
They're savages.
Dehumanizing, labeling certain people "savages", is the oldest propagandistic nonsense in the book.
- You are an anti-Semite.
If you haven't objected exactly as strongly to every other murderous outrage in world history as you do to this one, you're an anti-Semite.
My interviewee may have actually believed that the only war I've ever objected to is the one he's currently shilling for. But correcting him couldn't sway his belief that the world in general, the International Court of Justice, the International Criminal Court, and various human rights groups -- including Israeli ones -- are all simply prejudiced against Jews / Israel (the two being the same apparently). And yet, what if the entire world including me were actually anti-Semitic and for that reason objecting only to this particular incident of mass murder? Wouldn't it still be mass murder? Wouldn't we be right, not wrong, to object at least this one time?
- Israel kills people for the benefit of the United States.
It doesn't even ask for U.S. troops to die.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
1
1
Post Article Comment and Rate This Article
