Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 7 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Best Web OpEds    H3'ed 4/8/26  

Supreme Court Poised to Gut Remaining Protections of Voting Rights Act

Quicklink Submitted By   1 comment, 2 series
Author 8481
Senior Editor

Marta Steele
Message Marta Steele
Become a Fan
  (17 fans)


Supreme Court
(Image by OZinOH from flickr)
  Details   DMCA

"The prohibition of racial discrimination in voting and the right to have absentee ballots counted are in grave peril. ... The Supreme Court appears poised to deal a severe blow to the fundamental right to vote in two cases this term. Louisiana v. Callais threatens the right to vote free from racial discrimination and Watson v. Republican National Committee will test the right to have your absentee ballots counted."

Read the rest of the story HERE:

At truthout.org
Rate It | View Ratings

Marta Steele Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Marta Steele is an author/editor/blogger who has been writing for Opednews.com since 2006. She is also author of the 2012 book "Grassroots, Geeks, Pros, and Pols: The Election Integrity Movement's Nonstop Battle to Win Back the People's Vote, (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this quicklink has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments


Marta Steele

Become a Fan (Member since Nov 1, 2007), 17 fans, 373 articles, 236 quicklinks, 1148 comments, 74 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content
Roberts has had his eye on the VRA since his days as an assistant attorney general, the early 1980s, when colleagues in the Reagan administration agreed that the heart of the VRA, especially section 5 but also section 2, intruded on state regulations. In 2000, along with present-day Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett, he assisted George W. Bush in halting the vote recount in Florida in Election 2000. In 2013, Roberts wrote the majority opinion in the case that struck down Section 5 of the VRA. Now section 2 is on the chop block.

Submitted on Wednesday, Apr 8, 2026 at 9:09:55 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

 
Want to post your own comment on this Quicklink? Post Comment


 

Tell A Friend