Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 3/24/26  

"But Kamala!" Yeah, So What?

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   No comments

Thomas Knapp
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Thomas Knapp

Soda
Soda
(Image by fimoculous from flickr)
  Details   DMCA

"They told me if I voted for Goldwater in 1964," William F. Buckley, Jr. allegedly (but not verifiably) once said, "that we'd have more war and higher prices. Well, I did, and we do."

In the run-up to the 2024 presidential election, supporters of Donald Trump delivered similar dire predictions about voting for Kamala Harris.

And in the aftermath? The last two words of the apocryphal Buckley quote ring true as well.

For some reason, those who still support Trump seem to think that "but Kamala! If SHE'D won, we'd have had [insert list of bad things that have happened since anyway here]!" is some kind of sick burn on those who preferred the empty pantsuit to the senile reality TV star.

Personally, I see the whole situation neither as an excuse for Trump's failures nor a sign that Harris should have won the job, but rather as a demonstration that the "D" or "R" next to a candidate's name is entirely about marketing.

When it comes to substance, those parties and the politicians affiliated with them are pretty much peas in a pod.

In fact, the "Republican" and "Democrat" labels aren't even really separate brands so much as "regular" vs. "zero-sugar" variants of the same product.

I say that with my doctor's advice on diet for type 2 diabetics in mind:

"Diet" soda, she tells me, actually produces similar blood glucose spikes to those one gets from "regular" soda ("pop" to some of you up north).

Her advice: Give up soda altogether. It's just generally bad for you.

While I haven't taken that advice (give me Diet Dr. Pepper or give me death!), I suspect it's good advice.

The problem really does analogize well -- political government as soda.

Sugar or no sugar, cola versus lemon-lime, the name on the label, etc. aren't the problem. The problem is the product TYPE, not the specific variant.

If you vote Democrat, you're going to get more government spending, more foreign wars, more domestic surveillance, incarceration, and suppression of dissent, etc.

If you vote Republican, you're going to get more government spending, more foreign wars, more domestic surveillance, incarceration, and suppression of dissent, etc.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Thomas Knapp Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Thomas L. Knapp is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (thegarrisoncenter.org). He lives and works in north central Florida.


Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Big Question About the UN Security Council's Gaza Ceasefire Resolution

2020: I'm So Sick of Superlatives

Hypocrisy Alert: Republicans Agreed with Ocasio-Cortez Until About One Minute Ago

America Doesn't Have Presidential Debates, But It Should

Murder On The High Seas: Trump May Be Immune, But Are His Co-Conspirators?

Chickenhawk Donald: A Complete and Total Disgrace

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   


You can enter 2000 characters.
Become a Premium Member Would you like to be able to enter longer comments? You can enter 10,000 characters with Leader Membership. Simply sign up for your Premium Membership and you can say much more. Plus you'll be able to do a lot more, too.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 

Username
Password
Show Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

No comments  Post Comment

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Tell A Friend