Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 1/16/26
  

The Battle to Defeat Climate Change: The Dumbest, Most Incompetent War Ever Waged (With More at Stake Than Ever)

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   18 comments

Bernard Starr
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Bernard Starr
Become a Fan
  (13 fans)

A 'war' without a leader or central command
A 'war' without a leader or central command
(Image by Bernard Starr, created with AI)
  Details   DMCA

On further reflection, the so-called war on climate change is worse than incompetent. Incompetence implies failed leadership and flawed execution. What we face is something more alarming: the absence of leadership altogether. There is no central authority, no unified command, and no one empowered to set priorities, coordinate action, or enforce an effective global strategy. This is a war in name only and tragically, one structurally incapable of victory.

Following Al Gore's 2006 film, An Inconvenient Truth, which brought the existential threat of climate change into public view, no unified plan of action emerged. Unfortunately, what developed--and persists--is a vast but disorganized effort: millions of "foot soldiers" scattered across government agencies, corporations, nonprofits, universities, and concerned citizens worldwide.

Despite the immense scale of the global climate industry, there is still no central registry identifying who the actors are, where they operate, what they are doing, or how much funding they receive--and from whom. Even more troubling, there is no command structure to coordinate this sprawling enterprise and no authority empowered to concentrate resources and personnel on the rapid development of technologies with a realistic chance of halting climate change.

After three decades and trillions of dollars spent, the outcome is unmistakable: atmospheric CO2 levels have reached record highs, global temperatures continue to climb, and the planet is in worse condition than when this disorganized campaign began.

A historical contrast helps clarify the failure:

Imagine it is December 7, 1941. Pearl Harbor has just been attacked. Now imagine President Franklin D. Roosevelt addressing the nation with these words:"My fellow Americans, on this day of infamy, I call on all patriotic citizens to rise up and fight the enemy."

If that had been the essence of his "battle plan," World War II would have been lost.

Instead, President Roosevelt unified the nation under a single, organized command with one purpose: victory. The War Department was authorized to lead strategic planning. The draft created a massive army under centralized control. To coordinate operations of the military services, the Joint Chiefs of Staff was created (JCS). By Executive Order FDR established the War Production Board to transform peacetime industries into a coordinated engine of wartime manufacturing. Automakers were ordered to cease production of civilian vehicles and began turning out tanks, planes, munitions, and more. Every resource was aligned toward one goal: winning

Now contrast that with today's farcical "war" on climate change, where we somehow expect the very nations and institutions that created the crisis to solve it--essentially hiring the thieves to catch the thieves. No authoritative structure exists to organize, direct, or enforce a winning global strategy.

Fossil-fuel-producing nations have repeatedly failed to meet their emission-reduction commitments; virtually all are expanding production. Corporations that have pledged to shrink their carbon footprints have, in most cases, increased them. This trend is likely to worsen as nearly every company on the planet adopts energy-hungry AI systems. Add to that the explosive growth of the crypto industry, which consumes massive amounts of electricity

Is it any surprise that we are losing the dumbest war ever waged?

World War II threatened America's democracy and national survival. Climate change threatens something far greater: the survival of life on this planet. Meeting that threat demands the same unified command, coordinated global planning, and full mobilization of resources that the U.S. mustered in its darkest hour.

Only such organization and authority can concentrate resources at the scale necessary to bring truly climate-defeating technologies to full commercial functionality. A centralized command to set strategy and allocate resources could be implemented in a far more streamlined manner than the World War II mobilization, without totally disrupting daily life, if nations finally commit to the international cooperation and resolve required to win.

Rate It | View Ratings

Bernard Starr Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Bernard Starr has written extensively on climate change since 2007, arguing that the crisis demands a coordinated, mission-driven response on the scale of the Manhattan Project. His work focuses on the structural failures of climate leadership (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Corporations Plan for Post-Middle-Class America

Mind Control: How Donald Trump Has Transformed Americans into Pavlov's Dogs

How Congress Became a 'Cathouse' of Prostitutes Paying Off Their Pimps

Three Technologies That Can Stop Climate Change. Why Isn't the World Making a Massive Investment in Developing Them?

The Pandemic Disease of the 21st Century Is on the Rise

Reza Aslan: Why Aren't You a Jew?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

5 people are discussing this page, with 18 comments


Bernard Starr

Become a Fan
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Dec 7, 2010), 13 fans, 203 articles, 1 quicklinks, 386 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content
The current strategy to defeat climate change is clearly both figuratively and literally on a path toward a dead end. Activ should embrace this and concentrate on promoting a strategy along the lines suggested in this article.

Submitted on Friday, Jan 16, 2026 at 8:58:21 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

John Henry Egan

Become a Fan
(Member since Aug 9, 2021), 3 fans, 19 articles, 192 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content
I see Kamala Harris just bought an 8 million dollar waterfront home in Malibu. Maybe we better esplain to her the dangers of global warming and rising sea-levels. How can she not know?

Submitted on Friday, Jan 16, 2026 at 12:15:01 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (2+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
Indent

Bernard Starr

Become a Fan
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Dec 7, 2010), 13 fans, 203 articles, 1 quicklinks, 386 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to John Henry Egan:   New Content
Good point! Illustrates how out of touch people are about the dangers of climate change.

Submitted on Friday, Jan 16, 2026 at 12:30:57 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
IndentIndent

John Henry Egan

Become a Fan
(Member since Aug 9, 2021), 3 fans, 19 articles, 192 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Bernard Starr:   New Content
Maybe she knows something we don't know?

Submitted on Friday, Jan 16, 2026 at 3:10:25 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

Chuck Nafziger

Become a Fan
(Member since Oct 12, 2008), 20 fans, 15 articles, 17 quicklinks, 2954 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

I too used to think CO2 drove climate. I joined that cult in the late 1970s, when, as a scuba instructor, I read of threats to the Great Barrier Reef from the crown-of-thorns sea star that liked warm water. After fifty years in the climate cult, I started to question why I was seeing no change. |The garbage science that bolstered the covid flu got me to do the math and see the impossibility of a meaningful CO2-tempereature connection. That opened my mind to a common sense look at the weather and climate. The many trillion dollar boondoggle of windmills and solar panels that is trashing birds, bats and bugs while destroying vast land areas finally made sense; not a pretty picture/

Bill Gates recently said climate is not a big threat. He funds science for narrative, not truth. Watch climate change get brushed into the dumpster. Supporting climate change is now 'beating a dead boogieman.'

Submitted on Friday, Jan 16, 2026 at 8:11:53 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (1+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
Indent

David Wieland

Become a Fan
(Member since Jan 1, 2019), 2 fans, 1238 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Chuck Nafziger:   New Content

The "dead boogieman" term fits, as does the term "science denier", perverted by those who think attaching it to realists is some kind of honesty. It's becoming clear to more scientists that the slight warming of ocean water releases dissolved CO2, but there's still no sign that anyone's climate has actually changed. The UN's Gutierrez preaches that we're now in the age of "global boiling", making it clear that he's unfamiliar with northern winter. Why have none of the COPs been held in Canada or Norway in the winter? I think we all know the reason.

Submitted on Friday, Jan 16, 2026 at 10:06:50 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (1+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
Indent

Bernard Starr

Become a Fan
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Dec 7, 2010), 13 fans, 203 articles, 1 quicklinks, 386 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Chuck Nafziger:   New Content

The data doesn't lie. CO2 reached a record high last year and is continuing to rise. In 2008 scientists warned not to breach 380ppm. In May 2025 it reached 430 ppm. That poses dangers to health in addition to resulting in rising temperatures around the globe with unfriendly consequences. Icebergs and glaciers are melting. That adds water to the oceans. Simple arithmetic can tell you how high the oceans will rise given the volume of melting ice. If the oceans rise to certain heights it will flood coastal communities below the level that the oceans rise--and further inland, depending on how high the rise. Untold numbers will die. When perma-ice in the Arctic melts It will release massive amounts of methane gas that has been encased for thousands of years with disastrous consequences. These are facts not spin or opinions.

Submitted on Friday, Jan 16, 2026 at 10:16:23 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
IndentIndent

John Henry Egan

Become a Fan
(Member since Aug 9, 2021), 3 fans, 19 articles, 192 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Bernard Starr:   New Content
Every time I see news like this from today: "DANGEROUS COLD is likely on Saturday across much of the United States, with wind chills forecasted to fall below zero for over 100 million people." I wonder what can convice the alarmists. If the earth is steadily warming over the past 50 years this sholdn't be happening.

Submitted on Monday, Jan 19, 2026 at 10:59:59 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (1+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
IndentIndentIndent

Bernard Starr

Become a Fan
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Dec 7, 2010), 13 fans, 203 articles, 1 quicklinks, 386 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to John Henry Egan:   New Content

Scientists have explained that climate change produces extreme weather in both directions but mostly in the direction of dangerous overheating of the planet. Again, the data show that the planet on the whole is overheating and continues to do so each year. One member of Congress tried to illustrate a few years ago that there was no climate change by displaying a snowball that he made that day: shockingly silly!

Submitted on Monday, Jan 19, 2026 at 12:49:09 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

Chuck Nafziger

Become a Fan
(Member since Oct 12, 2008), 20 fans, 15 articles, 17 quicklinks, 2954 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content
If any of that happens, look at weather manipulation, poisoned or otherwise stripped landscapes, and scientific hot air for causes, not an invisible trace gas.

Submitted on Saturday, Jan 17, 2026 at 2:17:02 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

kappie

Become a Fan
(Member since May 6, 2010), 2 fans, 752 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Only fools or those working for the oil companies can keep de nying climate change.We have see n record high temperatures in the summer going up each summer and record cold waves in the winter.this was all predicted by the climate experts.there have been many reports of coral reefs dying around the world which could mean the end of oceans and ocean life.Flooding from melting ice bergs have affected many peoples coastal homes and record droughts in many parts of the country and the world.evidence about global warming is all around us and even in the US politicians do little and a fool named Donnie pushes more oil and co2 production.When we can no longer breath or find disappearing water we might take this seriously and yes,communities are reportingdisappearing water.

Submitted on Friday, Jan 23, 2026 at 2:52:40 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
Indent

Chuck Nafziger

Become a Fan
(Member since Oct 12, 2008), 20 fans, 15 articles, 17 quicklinks, 2954 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to kappie:   New Content
Please show me some science that shows how CO2 in trace amounts, measured in parts per million, has any meaningful effect on our temperature or climate.

Submitted on Saturday, Jan 24, 2026 at 10:35:03 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (1+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
Indent

David Wieland

Become a Fan
(Member since Jan 1, 2019), 2 fans, 1238 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to kappie:   New Content
How can any thinking person still push global warming as somehow endangering us, especially in the depths of what the weather folks in Canada are calling the coldest winter in 30 years? I'd like to see the next UN COP held in Ottawa in February. I wonder how the high poobahs in the organization would deal with the disconnect -- otherwise known as reality.

Submitted on Saturday, Jan 24, 2026 at 11:32:42 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (1+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
IndentIndent

Bernard Starr

Become a Fan
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Dec 7, 2010), 13 fans, 203 articles, 1 quicklinks, 386 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to David Wieland:   New Content

Here is the AI response that spells out the science of climate change in response to the question: Does this cold winter contradict climate change and the warming of the planet? ChatGPT said: Short answer: nope-- one cold winter doesn't contradict climate change at all. It actually fits what climate science predicts. Here's the clean way to think about it: Weather does not = climate. Weather is what you feel this season or this week. Climate is the long-term average over decades. A cold winter is a blip; global warming is a trend. You can still have cold days-- or even cold winters-- on a warming planet, just like a rising stock market still has down days. A warming planet can cause extreme cold in places. This sounds counterintuitive, but warming-- especially in the Arctic-- can weaken the polar jet stream. When that happens, cold polar air can spill south more often, leading to harsher cold snaps in mid-latitudes. So some unusually cold winters are actually linked to a warming Arctic.

Submitted on Sunday, Jan 25, 2026 at 12:15:31 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
IndentIndentIndent

Chuck Nafziger

Become a Fan
(Member since Oct 12, 2008), 20 fans, 15 articles, 17 quicklinks, 2954 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Bernard Starr:   New Content
.In the old days, what you are describing was called "weather." But that was before weather manipulation was weaponized.

Submitted on Sunday, Jan 25, 2026 at 9:30:00 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (2+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
IndentIndentIndent

John Henry Egan

Become a Fan
(Member since Aug 9, 2021), 3 fans, 19 articles, 192 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Bernard Starr:   New Content

Gracho used to say " Who do you believe, me or what you see with your own two eyes?" Here's today's arctic ice sheet. Al Gore told us it would be gone in 2015.
--
(Image by john egan) Details DMCA

Submitted on Wednesday, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:44:39 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (1+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
IndentIndentIndentIndent

Bernard Starr

Become a Fan
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Dec 7, 2010), 13 fans, 203 articles, 1 quicklinks, 386 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to John Henry Egan:   New Content
It was foolish of Al Gore to give precise dates for when events will play out. But the fact is that the icebergs and glaciers are melting and will have disastrous consequences eventually as sea levels rise from the added water. Also, the rising temperatures in the Arctic (fact) adds to the heating of the planet, which is increasing every year. These are facts which you may not be able to see directly with your eyes-- but soe you can see if you view the images of the ice melts.These iages are readily available. Also, another fact is that CO2 in the atmosphere is rising and last year reached an historic high. High concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere is not the air that I wish to breathe, maybe you do? But let's look at this another way. Since science does not deal in absolutes but only probabilities, every point of view has a probability of being correct. Although the Consensus of Scientists is confirmation of climate change, maybe they are wrong and you are right --and your view, even if a low probability, is possibly correct. For example, maybe an ice age will start tomorrow. If you are correct that climate change is a hoax and the scientists are wrong, what are the consequences? The main consequence is that we will have overspent on contributing to a cleaner planet. But if the scientists are correct and you are wrong, the consequences will be disastrous for life on this planet. If given uncertainty, (A fundamental principle of science) which side would you want to err on?

Submitted on Wednesday, Jan 28, 2026 at 2:00:36 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
IndentIndentIndent

David Wieland

Become a Fan
(Member since Jan 1, 2019), 2 fans, 1238 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Bernard Starr:   New Content

Pray tell, where did that lost heat go? I hadn't heard that the tropics are much hotter than usual. Realistically speaking, this warming-causes-cold notion is a shining example of what Edward de Bono described as the Intelligence Trap, the phenomenon of a highly intelligent person being able to come up with an explanation for anything. AI is similar. Knowledge is not the same thing.

Submitted on Wednesday, Jan 28, 2026 at 11:26:57 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Tell A Friend