Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 4 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H1'ed 3/3/26
  

Trump: The Weakest President in 50 Years -- His Own People Just Proved It

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   4 comments
Author 1
Editor-in-Chief

Rob Kall
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Rob Kall
Become a Fan
  (293 fans)


US attacked Iran because of 'imminent threat', says Marco Rubio. #US #Iran #BBCNews
(Image by YouTube, Channel: BBC News)
  Details   DMCA
>

Secretary of State Marco Rubio and House Speaker Mike Johnson have now handed the American left the most damning indictment of Donald Trump's leadership imaginable -- and they don't even seem to realize it.

Rubio stood before reporters on Capitol Hill and explained why the United States attacked Iran: "We knew that there was going to be an Israeli action. We knew that that would precipitate an attack against American forces, and we knew that if we didn't preemptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties." (Al Jazeera)

Read that again. The United States Secretary of State just told the world that America went to war because Israel decided to, and we couldn't stop them.

Johnson drove the point home even more nakedly: "Israel was determined to act in their own defense here, with or without American support." (The Hill)

With or without American support. A nation of 9 million people -- one that receives over $21 billion in U.S. military aid -- dragged the most powerful military in human history into a war, and the best defense Trump's allies can offer is that he had no choice.

The media is missing the real story here. They're saying this rationale doesn't make sense. It makes perfect sense -- once you accept that Trump was too weak to tell Netanyahu no.

For fifty years, every president -- Republican and Democrat -- was strong enough to restrain Israel from this exact move. Nixon. Reagan. Both Bushes. Clinton. Obama. None of them let Israel dictate American war policy. Trump couldn't manage it. Netanyahu had been urging Trump to strike Iran since December (Axios) -- and Trump folded.

Iran's foreign minister put it bluntly: "US has entered a war of choice on behalf of Israel. There was never any so-called Iranian 'threat.'" (The Times of Israel) Even Steve Bannon -- Steve Bannon -- was left bewildered: "If we knew Israel would strike and Iran would retaliate against us, where was the coordination? We need a strategic explanation." (Axios)

When you've lost Bannon, you've lost the plot.

And there's more. The most damning indictment of Trump's capitulation to Netanyahu isn't coming from the left -- it's coming from his own base. Tucker Carlson has been unequivocal: "It's hard to say this, but the United States didn't make the decision here. Benjamin Netanyahu did. This happened because Israel wanted it to happen. This is Israel's war. This is not the United States' war." (The Times of Israel) Carlson didn't just say it publicly -- he reportedly met with Trump three times in the Oval Office to urge him to "restrain" Netanyahu, arguing that Netanyahu's desire to attack Iran was the sole reason Trump was considering the strike. Trump told him the U.S. had no choice. (The Hill) No choice. The most powerful man in the world told one of his closest media allies that he had no choice but to follow the lead of a foreign prime minister.

Candace Owens was equally blunt: "This was not Trump's decision, it was Bibi Netanyahu's decision and that is the reason that he did it. We're very aware that Israel is dictating our foreign policy and we would like that to stop." (Rolling Stone) Megyn Kelly said the American soldiers who died did not die for the United States -- "I think they died for Iran or for Israel." (TheWrap) Rep. Thomas Massie called it a betrayal of "America First," and Marjorie Taylor Greene called it the "worst betrayal" of the MAGA movement. (The Jerusalem Post) When Trump's most loyal supporters -- the people who have defended his every move for a decade -- are saying he did Netanyahu's bidding, the weakness argument isn't fringe anymore. It's the conclusion his own coalition has reached.

This is the message that must be repeated a million times: Trump is the weakest president in 50 years. He couldn't say no to a smaller, dependent ally. He let Netanyahu set America's war agenda. He got played -- and now six American service members are dead, 18 more are seriously wounded.

Trump has always won on "strength." That illusion just shattered. His own Secretary of State confessed it on national television. The macho strongman who promised "America First" went to war because Israel told him to.

That's not strength. That's a puppet who can't cut his own strings.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Rob Kall Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Rob Kall is an award winning journalist, inventor, software architect, connector and visionary. His work and his writing have been featured in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, CNN, ABC, the HuffingtonPost, Success, Discover and other media.

Check out his platform at RobKall.com

He is the author of The Bottom-up Revolution; Mastering the Emerging World of Connectivity

He's given talks and workshops to Fortune 500 execs and national medical and psychological organizations, and pioneered first-of-their-kind conferences in Positive Psychology, Brain Science and Story. He hosts some of the world's smartest, most interesting and powerful people on his Bottom Up Radio Show, and founded and publishes one of the top Google- ranked progressive news and opinion sites, OpEdNews.com

more detailed bio:

Rob Kall has spent his adult life as an awakener and empowerer-- first in the field of biofeedback, inventing products, developing software and a music recording label, MuPsych, within the company he founded in 1978-- Futurehealth, and founding, organizing and running 3 conferences: Winter Brain, on Neurofeedback and consciousness, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology (a pioneer in the field of Positive Psychology, first presenting workshops on it in 1985) and Storycon Summit Meeting on the Art Science and Application of Story-- each the first of their kind. Then, when he found the process of raising people's consciousness (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Debunking Hillary's Specious Winning the Popular Vote Claim

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Hillary's Disingenuous Claim That She's Won 2.5 Million More Votes is Bogus. Here's why

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

4 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments


Scott Baker

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Oct 25, 2008), 77 fans, 380 articles, 1491 quicklinks, 3996 comments, 41 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram Page

  New Content

Of course Netanyahu wanted U.S. assistance in fighting the largest sponsor of state terrorism in the world, and through its proxies, the greatest existential threat to Israel: Iran. That's no secret. But other regional countries, especially those under the recently negotiated Abraham Accords and those who are trying to modernize, like Saudi Arabia (yes, they have a very long way to go), also saw Iran as their worst regional threat (one of the greatest mistakes or deliberate lies in foreign policy ever, was getting rid of Saddam Husein; Iraq was the biggest counterweight to Iran, in a region where nothing but power and ideology is respected).

See the NY Times in-depth article, written by an unusually large team of 6 reporters: How Trump Decided to Go to War. It emphasizes the Israeli push, but includes other motivations as well. Several things can be true at once: Iran was still pursuing nuclear weapons (the "obliteration" of its nuclear development program last August was never credible); Iran threatened the stability of weaker states like Lebanon through its major proxy: Hezbollah - which Israel is currently bombing, again. Iran is also the tip of the spear of an Islamic push to take over the world in a worldwide caliphate. Don't dismiss this; none of the 57 currently Muslim majority countries started out that way 1,400 years ago. They all used to have other religions but were conquered by the most imperialist political-religion system the world has ever known, and one which is spreading south into sub-Saharan Africa and north into Europe (again) even today, violently and relentlessly. Trump won't say that because he doesn't want to attack the religion of some of his favorite benefactors like Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Dubai, and other Islamic countries that shower him with gifts, money, and let him build his expensive hotels and golf courses in their countries without the hassles Western democracies give him. Trump wishes he could be a king like those nations have too. And they don't want a revaunchist, anti-development, violent Jihadist-producing (even though Saudi Arabia produces more) country mucking things up for them. Privately, the leaders of most of them wish Islam would get out of the way, but they need to keep it going to deflect the populace from their own constant failures, due to...Islam. But stopping the leader of the Caliphate movement is, IMO, the greatest reason to go to war with Iran, even if not talked about openly. Seen through that lens, other America-destabilized countries like Libya, Iraq, are not failures, because they are off-the-board as far as regional threats are concerned. That's the cruel efficiency of American foreign policy, going back to Kissenger, if not earlier (BTW, Vietnam, from Kissenger's era and influence, is now a significant trading partner with the U.S., so maybe in a few decades, Iraq and Libya might be too?).

Marco Rubio also said that the U.S. couldn't wait until Iran built up so many weapons and ammunition that it would be impossible to stop them from building up to a nuclear weapon; Iran is weaker now than it has been in decades, thanks to its people in near constant - and incredibly brave - protest against its domestic policy, distracted by foreign adventurism. Iranians are mostly welcoming American intervention, both in Iran and in the diaspora. Out of 92 million people it can be hard to tell from the oversized crowds which way the country leans in the majority, but most of them believe they were misled by the Ayatollah Khomeini into believing he would create a democracy instead of the awful monarchy of the Shah - which he kind of did, but he didn't tell them it would be strongly under control of the Mullahs in a theocracy even more brutal than the Shah's Iran, which was pro-Western.

Hopefully, the regime will be toppled and some kind of pro-Western, or at least not violently anti-Western, human rights respecting, anti-misogynist, democratic regime will arise in its place. Trump's "victory" in Venezuela made him think regime change would be easy. It won't be. Not in Iran. It's too large and complex and its recent history is too much to overcome overnight. The IRGC has too many hands in its economy, and could end up in control of the country, even if there's another nominal Ayatollah appointed. But the status quo was unacceptable. Something had to be done, for the sake of Iran, for the sake of the world.

Submitted on Tuesday, Mar 3, 2026 at 9:46:41 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (1+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

David Wieland

Become a Fan
(Member since Jan 1, 2019), 2 fans, 1243 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

It's hard to believe that you actually quoted the Iranian foreign minister as a good source. Spinning the coordination between the US and Israel as Israel forcing the US is another sign of misunderstanding the reality of facing down the dire threat Iran has posed. Trump has repeatedly shown reluctance to use military force against hostile adversaries, but that's definitely not been refusal to do so. I know that leftists, including many in the Jewish diaspora, have shown more concern for Palestinians and Islamists in general than for Israelis, but they do so mostly from the comfort of places not under constant threat of terrorist attacks.

Trump has seemed to be as gullible as most Westerners in imagining that negotiation with Islamists was possible (even in Israel, as the handover of Gaza clearly demonstrated), but he, along with those of us paying close attention and learning more history, finally realized that doesn't work against a religiously motivated death cult. It's the Iranian regime that has pushed this war, and further delay would only allow Iran to expand its arsenal and cause even more death and destruction.

Claims that Iran posed no threat to the US are based on wishful thinking that is enabled by misinformation and lack of understanding. That Western media repeatedly reports "information" from Hamas and the IRGC as valid, while treating information from Israeli and even American sources as suspect, is shameful. Our gullibility will doom us to further decline if we don't wake up to the Islamists too-successful manipulation. Iranians around the world are rejoicing at the prospect of the end of brutal Islamist oppression. Why is there such denial among Westerners, especially media?

Submitted on Tuesday, Mar 3, 2026 at 9:51:56 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (1+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
Indent

Steven P Mitchell

Become a Fan
(Member since Aug 7, 2018), 1 fan, 3 articles, 100 comments, 2 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter Page Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to David Wieland:   New Content
Well David, at least you are open about your biases against Islam and its political subordinates. It's too bad that you seem so unfamiliar with the historical details that accompany these historical events, as if the Islamic reactions to western measures arise out of the blue, without provocation. I'm not a fan of Hamas, but I do recognize that Israel had literally walled off the population of Gaza from interactions with Israel's economy and society, along with Lebanon's, and the Palestinians were being suffocated through isolation by the Israeli state and the Israeli's direct control over Gaza's access to the outside world. And at least in Gaza, Israel should have expected some level of reprisal from Hamas, as the Palestinians were already wasting away, prior to Israel's vindictive 'family for an eye' response since October 7, 2024. From your opinions, I gather that you believe that US foreign policy should be subordinate to that of Israel's.

Submitted on Sunday, Mar 8, 2026 at 11:55:04 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

Tom Fisher

Become a Fan
(Member since Mar 30, 2017), 2 fans, 100 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

When your right you are right. Not only did it show how weak trump is it shows how manipulated and occupied our government is by Israel. The entire administrations goal was to take orders from Israel without thinking to warn us citizens abroad , without protecting our real allies in the region. There was no coordination to remove troops or embassy or citizens from us bases abroad. Israel not only was able to topple an adversary that would have acted in preventing Israel from expanding its border in Syria and Lebanon (which is Israel's true goal , just took path the off patch on the military uniform ) it also effectively made the USA lose their standing and respect in the area - the Saudi's, uae and Qataris donot need or respect ally that removes missile defense batteries from their own countries and moves them to protect Israel, while the us bases and ally infrastructure gets pummeled. Israel kills two birds with one stone , it has destroyed both the US and Iran. Israel will be unchecked in the Middle East , thus taking everything over including our former security role and our weapons and the USA will be effectively rejected from the region. Leaving Israel , a violent terrorist state to rule the Middle East and Europe (gas) and no amount of tongue bathing of Israel by Scott baker and David wieland could ever make this to be a good thing.

Submitted on Thursday, Mar 5, 2026 at 9:20:02 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Tell A Friend